Daily domain intelligence from RobotDomainSearch — auction picks, industry news, and market insights powered by real data.
🔥 Today’s Domain Pick
shipboard.com — $103 current bid (17 bids)
Nine letters. Twenty-eight years old. A real English word you’ll find in every major dictionary — Merriam-Webster, Cambridge, Oxford, Britannica — and it’s sitting in a Namecheap auction at $103.
“Shipboard” means aboard a ship, and the word cuts across a massive industry. L3Harris uses “shipboard design engineering” as a core service line for naval systems. Camcode markets shipboard equipment marking solutions. Spec-Built Systems builds naval ship furniture. The U.S. Navy’s technical documentation is saturated with the term. Our Name-Search-Presence API scores it 62/100 — and here’s why that matters: for a dictionary word, high search presence is bullish. There’s no “Shipboard Inc.” squatting on the brand. The results are all dictionary definitions and industrial use cases. Whoever buys shipboard.com owns the word in the namespace.
The numbers tell the story:
- RDS Valuation: $85,000 – $185,000 – $425,000 (72% confidence)
- Quality Score: 65
- Current Bid: $103 (17 bids)
- Pronounceability: 100/100
- Pattern: Compound (ship + board)
- Registered: 1998 (28 years)
- Ends: March 25, 2026
Our valuation API ran a full-tier analysis. The mid estimate of $185,000 is anchored by comparable compound .com sales: crossfire.com ($125,000), signable.com ($101,250), footage.com ($300,000), and youcoin.com ($198,000). The statistical median for compound .com domains in the 7–11 character range is $79,150 with a mean of $121,656 across 150 verified sales. The heuristic engine gives it a TLD score of 100/100 (premium .com), word score of 80/100, and pronounceability of 100/100 — a perfect score because “shipboard” is a word people already say.
This is the kind of domain that illustrates a critical principle in domain investing: the difference between a dictionary word and a coined brand when it comes to namespace crowding. A coined name like “roomzy” with high search presence is a warning — it means Roomzy LTD, roomzy.co.in, and @teamroomzy are all competing for that brand. But a dictionary word like “shipboard” with high search presence is an opportunity — no one owns the word, and the .com holder would own the category.
The global shipping market is valued at over $14 trillion. Maritime technology, shipboard automation, cruise line operations, naval logistics — every one of these verticals needs digital presence. At $103 with 17 bids, the auction is pricing this 28-year-old dictionary .com at 0.056% of its mid estimate — a 1,796x multiple. Comparable dictionary compound .coms rarely trade below five figures at market.
📰 Domain News
Icon.com’s $12M AI Business Shuts Down — What Happens to the Domain?
Last spring, entrepreneur Kennan Davison made headlines when he acquired Icon.com for $12 million to launch an AI advertising business. At the time, it looked like a textbook premium domain play — a single dictionary word, a massive use case, and a founder willing to pay eight figures for the brand. But the story has taken a sharp turn. Reports indicate the business has shut down entirely, and Icon.com is no longer resolving to an active website. The immediate question for the domain industry: what happens to a $12M domain when the company behind it folds? Does it go to auction? Does a creditor claim it? Does Davison hold it as a personal asset? The fate of Icon.com will be a case study in how premium domains are treated in business wind-downs — and whether a domain purchased at peak AI hype retains its value when the venture fails.
Source: DNJournal · Mar 2026
ICANN New gTLD Applications Open April 30 — Here’s the Timeline
ICANN 85 in Mumbai brought the clearest timeline yet for the next round of new generic top-level domains. Applications open April 30, 2026 — the last possible day of ICANN’s promised window — and will remain open for 104 days until August 12. It’s not first-come, first-served: all applications are treated equally regardless of submission date. Reveal Day could come before October’s ICANN 87 meeting if application volume matches the 2012 round’s ~2,000 applications. A new wrinkle this time: applicants can swap their chosen string to a pre-selected “replacement string” within 14 days of reveal if they spot a contention set they want to avoid. After String Confirmation Day in November, strings are locked and the 104-day objection period begins. A Prioritization Draw lottery in December determines processing order. For domain investors, this is the starting gun on the biggest expansion of the namespace since 2012 — expect TLD speculation, defensive registrations, and brand strategy discussions to intensify through the summer.
Source: DomainIncite · Mar 2026
WIPO’s New $100 WHOIS Backdoor — File a UDRP, Get the Owner Data, Withdraw
WIPO quietly updated its UDRP fee schedule with a change that domain attorney John Berryhill called “huge news.” Previously, withdrawing a UDRP complaint before a panelist was appointed cost $500 (WIPO kept $500 of the $1,500 filing fee). Under the new schedule, WIPO retains only $100 if the complaint is withdrawn after the registrant’s information is disclosed but before a panelist is selected. Here’s the unintended consequence: when a UDRP is filed, the registrar must release the registrant’s details to the complainant within 48 hours — with no substantive review of the complaint itself. A skeletal filing with a sentence or two is sufficient. As Berryhill noted, you can include up to five unrelated domain names in a single filing, making it effectively $20 per name to unmask a privacy-protected registrant. For domain brokers, this eliminates the need for expensive brokerage commissions or elaborate investigative work to contact a domain owner. The registrant is never even notified the complaint was filed.
Source: DomainInvesting · Mar 2026
⏰ Best Auctions Closing Soon
Curated from 122,000+ auctions across all platforms. Scored on valuation-to-bid ratio, quality score, search volume, and brand potential. TLD diversity enforced.
🏷️ salvatore.ai — $116 · 8 bids · QS: 67 · SV: 64,000
RDS Valuation: $50,000 – $65,000 – $75,000 (85% confidence)
This is the widest valuation gap we’ve seen all week. At $116, salvatore.ai sits at 0.18% of its mid estimate — a 560x multiple. And the comparables aren’t speculative: cursive.ai ($70,000), gandalf.ai ($65,000), intuitive.ai ($125,000), companies.ai ($66,000), virtuoso.ai ($70,000), and wrangle.ai ($50,000). The statistical median for brandable .ai domains in the 7–11 character range is $64,900 across 15 verified sales.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 74/100 — a high signal driven by one of fashion’s most iconic names. Salvatore Ferragamo is a multi-billion dollar luxury house. R.A. Salvatore is a New York Times bestselling fantasy author. Salvatore’s is a beloved Rochester pizza chain. Lana Del Rey has a song called “Salvatore.” The name carries cultural weight across fashion, literature, food, and music — and now it has an .ai extension. For any AI company building in luxury tech, personal styling, creative writing, or hospitality, this domain is a shortcut to instant brand recognition.
With only 8 bids at $116 for a domain our model values at $65,000, this is either being overlooked or someone is waiting to strike. Ends today.
💎 dtq.org — $102 · 17 bids · QS: 62 · SV: 350
RDS Valuation: $10,000 – $15,000 – $20,000 (85% confidence)
Three-letter .org domains are a well-documented asset class, and the comparable sales leave little room for debate: dcf.org ($45,000), usd.org ($26,369), cia.org ($20,630), img.org ($20,000), ghf.org ($17,500), oom.org ($12,500), fiv.org ($13,000). The statistical median for LLL .org domains sits at $12,906 with a mean of $17,401 across 87 verified sales. At $102 with 17 bids, this 26-year-old domain is trading at less than 1% of its estimated market value.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 69/100 — “DTQ” maps to DTQ Company Limited (tea brand), Domestic Tradable Quota (environmental policy), Data Table Query (tech), the Difficult Times Questionnaire (Columbia University), an RCSB PDB ligand, an FDA product code, and even DTQ Little League in Virginia. Multiple industries, zero dominant owner. The three letters are unattached and available. Ends today.
🌡️ recently.io — $105 · 9 bids · QS: 61
RDS Valuation: $99 – $125 – $200 (85% confidence)
Here’s a case study in market efficiency. Our model places recently.io at a mid value of $125 — and the auction is already at $105, right in the estimated range. Unlike the other picks in today’s issue where the market hasn’t caught up to the valuation, this auction is pricing the domain almost exactly where the data says it should be. Comparables cluster tightly: smuggle.io ($99), devgame.io ($99), hypermesh.io ($99), adscience.io ($155), embarklabs.io ($185). The statistical median for brandable .io domains in the 6–10 character range is $99.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 59/100 — a medium signal. “Recently” is a pure dictionary word with no existing brand claiming it. Search results return nothing but dictionary definitions and grammar examples. That’s actually a positive for a potential buyer: the namespace is completely uncontested. A content aggregation startup, a “what happened recently” news app, or a social media trending tool could own this word in the tech context.
At $105, someone is paying fair market value for a clean dictionary word on the .io TLD — the domain world’s equivalent of efficient price discovery. Ends today.
🔥 Hot Auctions This Week
The most competitive auctions across all platforms — ranked by bid count, with valuation analysis. Deduplicated from previous issues.
chocolateroll.com — $111 · 69 bids · QS: 60
RDS Valuation: $75 – $150 – $300 (75% confidence)
Sixty-nine bids. That’s the most contested auction in today’s entire dataset — and it started at $1. The frenzy is real: chocolateroll.com combines two universally recognized English words into a domain that works for recipe blogs, bakery brands, candy companies, or food media. Our model’s mid estimate of $150 sits close to the current bid, suggesting the market is pricing this accurately. But with 69 bidders fighting over it, there’s clearly end-user demand driving the price above what pure comparables would predict.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 27/100 — a low signal, meaning no one has built a brand around “chocolate roll” yet. YouTube has recipe videos, Amazon has product listings, and Marinela sells “ChocoRoles” — but the exact compound word is unclaimed territory. For a food blogger or D2C brand, this is a blank canvas with instant comprehension. The .com TLD gives it maximum credibility in the food space where consumer trust matters.
At $111 with 69 bids, the momentum suggests this could close well above the current price.
chairphone.com — $93 · 57 bids · QS: 65
RDS Valuation: $500 – $1,500 – $5,000 (75% confidence)
In April 2024, Cricket Wireless and WWE created a 5G-enabled folding chair that was also a phone. It made calls, sent texts, played music, streamed video, and had a fog machine. They called it the Chair Phone, built a marketing campaign around it with WWE stars Chad Gable and Otis, sent mini phone-chair replicas to Cricket stores, and pointed the whole thing at chairphone.com. Chief Marketer covered it. TikTok videos went viral. Fierce Wireless wrote it up. Marketing Brew analyzed the campaign. The domain was the centerpiece of a major brand activation.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 49/100 — medium presence, entirely driven by the Cricket Wireless campaign. The domain has existing backlinks, brand mentions across marketing publications, and TikTok engagement. For anyone in the novelty tech, smart furniture, or marketing memorabilia space, this domain comes pre-loaded with press coverage and cultural recognition.
Now the domain is at auction. 57 bids at $93 from a $1 start. Our model’s mid estimate of $1,500 accounts for the compound word value and the marketing history. Ends today.
55tv.cc — $17 · 19 bids · QS: 46 · SV: 150
RDS Valuation: $25 – $45 – $80 (75% confidence)
The smallest domain in today’s issue tells one of the most interesting stories. The .cc TLD — the country code for Australia’s Cocos (Keeling) Islands — has become the quiet favorite of Chinese and international streaming platforms. 55tv.com is listed as a “strategic-grade domain.” 55tv.is operates a European IPTV streaming service with 1,300+ HD/4K channels. Sennheiser makes a SET 55TV wireless headphone. 55TV News runs an Indonesian news outlet.
Search Presence: Name-Search-Presence scores 57/100 — moderate presence across streaming, electronics, and news media. The numeric-letter combination “55tv” is inherently memorable: “55” is a common screen size, and “tv” is universally understood. On .cc, it targets the streaming and media markets where short, punchy domains are currency.
At $17 with 19 bids, this is a low-risk bet on a domain with a built-in audience. Comparable .cc sales hover in the $22–$105 range for similar short alphanumeric combinations (z7c.cc at $31, 3g1.cc at $105, kx7.cc at $36). The auction could end anywhere in that range.
📚 Domain History: .cc
The .cc TLD belongs to the Cocos (Keeling) Islands — a remote Australian territory of 27 coral islands in the Indian Ocean, home to about 600 people and thousands of coconut palms. The country code was delegated in 1997 to eNIC Corporation, which embarked on one of the most ambitious (and expensive) TLD marketing campaigns in internet history.
eNIC positioned .cc as “the next .com” — the letters conveniently mapping to “Commercial Company” or “Carbon Copy” in their advertising materials. They spent millions on Super Bowl commercials, Times Square billboards, and celebrity endorsements. The pitch was simple: .com is running out of good names, and .cc is the natural successor. Verisign agreed, acquiring the .cc registry in 2000 for $21 million as part of its eNIC purchase.
The Western mainstream never bought the pitch. But something unexpected happened: China did. The letters “cc” can be read as a homophone for “chā chā” (meaning “check” or “search”) in Mandarin, making it culturally resonant and easy to remember. Chinese internet companies, gaming platforms, and streaming services adopted .cc en masse. Numeric domains like 5211.cc and 9966.cc became valuable properties in the Chinese aftermarket. The TLD found its niche — not as the universal .com replacement eNIC envisioned, but as a premium short-code extension for the Chinese internet and the global streaming ecosystem.
Today, Verisign operates .cc alongside .com and .net, maintaining premium wholesale pricing. The registry quietly generates significant revenue despite never achieving the mainstream adoption its founders imagined. Recent sales demonstrate that premium .cc domains retain real value: ks.cc sold for $22,560 on NameJet. For domain investors, .cc sits in an interesting middle ground — too niche for most Western buyers, too established to ignore for anyone selling into Asian markets. Its story is a reminder that TLD adoption doesn’t always follow the path its creators intended.
→ Explore .cc statistics on RobotDomainSearch
Built by RobotDomainSearch — domain intelligence for humans and agents. Data sourced from 1M+ live auctions across Namecheap, Sedo, and Dynadot. Valuations powered by the RDS Valuation API.